Forum Home Forum Home > User Discussions and Community Support > Architecture and Deployment
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Deployment via Image
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Deployment via Image

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
jd1020 View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 20 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jd1020 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Deployment via Image
    Posted: 20 Apr 2011 at 6:57pm
I would like to include IDF in a master image and deploy it to my users that way. It was suggested to me that all of my machines may report in to the console with the same ID causing problems when running scans.
 
Thoughts?
Back to Top
mot1psu View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 24 Nov 2010
Location: Penn State
Status: Offline
Points: 26
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mot1psu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Apr 2011 at 9:50am
Hey jd,

I can think of a number of reasons why that could cause some problems. The first being is that you would have to build the image, patch OS/software etc., then take it off network before installing Idf so that it does not register with the console and get the endpointID. Or you could script the deletion of the endpointID from the registry as part of the imaging process.

Assuming you had the process worked out for that, once you image a box it would have to be kept off network while it was renamed so you dont have an issue of a console full of the same endpoint names with the guids appended.

Another point would be that what do you do every time Idf releases a new version? Go back to your gold master and update the image and then redeploy that to all your machines on the network? Idf has a pretty aggressive update schedule from our experience. For example we license and started testing version 4.1.3.2 for Windows and 2.1.1 for Mac in January of 2010. A scant 16 months later we are up to 4.7.0.5/3.7.0.5, Win/Mac respectively, with v5 on the way in the next few months (presumably, I do not know of any firm release dates).

Not to mention after each major point release there inevitably are several minor point releases containing other improvements, unforeseen bugs not found in testing, etc. Kind of a headache with an image, if you ask me.

Personally I think you would be better off if you have any type of infrastructure for deploying via SCCM, group policy, BigFix, Apple Remote Desktop or whatever your shop uses/has access to.

I hope that helps you out some.
Back to Top
mot1psu View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 24 Nov 2010
Location: Penn State
Status: Offline
Points: 26
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mot1psu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Apr 2011 at 9:53am
Actually I guess you could use the update machine name options on the console so that would be less of an issue in that instance, and could merge endpoints based on MAC address. I do still see the issue of the endpointID however, and that would still need to be overcome, as well as the updates which you could then also update via the console assuming you deploy a minimum version of 4.7/3.7 to take advantage of that feature.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down